Some people believe that international trade and communication with other countries is a positive trend, while others think it is harmful to nations and they might lose their identities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant examples.
Following the development of technology, adaptation is indispensable in almost every single country as it is an effective way to evolve and develop into a powerful nation. Nevertheless, trade and communication with other countries might be intriguing but it could also pose unexpected consequences toward the economy. Further in this essay, I will discuss about both side of this trend, the advantages as well as the disadvantageous influences that could possibly come up.
First and foremost, it is obvious that when a country open itself to the world, foreign companies will join and take part in the industry of various areas. On the account for that, domestic brands are no longer dominant in the economy but instead, it is now being shared with multinational giants, such event could result in an economical disturbance. As a matter of fact, it would lead to a much lower chance for traditional products to be booming in the market as exotic ones are now introduced to the public. Consequently, people start to lose their own identities since the values of cultural offering are being faded and forget. Moreover, the rise of foreign businesses is equivalent to a higher standard of skills and knowledge, it could potentially create massive unemployment for those who are unqualified for the job.
On the other hand, along with the introduction of multinational brand is the transferring of special advanced technology. As a result, the economic growth can be found due to increase of effectiveness in productivity. This would also emerge new industry in technological areas, producing more employment opportunities for talented people with satisfying salary. In addition, the nation will grow in a variety of area such as medical advancement or information technology. With the exposing of countless types of production, the market can now maximise customer satisfaction as they have a wider range of options to choose. Furthermore, this particular effect is also an appealing factor for tourist, generating a easier and more attractive environment for foreigners to live in.
In conclusion, despite the negative influence this trend could bring, it is also quite beneficial for the economical market as it would be a wonderful opportunity for a nation to innovate and become a successful country.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...pected consequences toward the economy. Further in this essay, I will discuss about bot...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...both side of this trend, the advantages as well as the disadvantageous influences that cou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 450, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
... as the disadvantageous influences that could possibly come up. First and foremost, it is obv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 712, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ppealing factor for tourist, generating a easier and more attractive environment ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27173913043 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16700036381 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595108695652 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3082376836 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162740274568 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550797950102 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528255095034 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100195295936 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483435699272 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...pected consequences toward the economy. Further in this essay, I will discuss about bot...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...both side of this trend, the advantages as well as the disadvantageous influences that cou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 450, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
... as the disadvantageous influences that could possibly come up. First and foremost, it is obv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 712, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ppealing factor for tourist, generating a easier and more attractive environment ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27173913043 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16700036381 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595108695652 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3082376836 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162740274568 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550797950102 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528255095034 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100195295936 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483435699272 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.