People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Upon commencing a new work in a foreign country, people often face a dilemma of going there with their family or not. While there are some negative consequences but I would argue that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, there are bound to be numerous problems when someone take his family to another country when he works abroad. The first issue is that it takes his family members a long time to accommodate to a new surrounding. If they cannot adhere to the new cultural ideas and behaviors they might have to face the hostility from the locals and suffer from the sense of isolation from society. In addition, normally, when a man travel to another country for work, his wife rarely has a job immediately. Be a single-income household in a city where living costs are very high like New York, London, Tokyo… is not comfortable. It is extremely a terrible burden.
On the other hand, I believe that the benefits are more significant than such disadvantages when going to a new homeland with family. Firstly, children will have chance to learn a new language and enlarge their knowledge about culture. For instance, moving to England, the kids are able to hear, speak, read and write the English language constantly, giving them countless opportunities to master their English skills. Secondly, living together helps to maintain the family bond. Unlike those people who work far from home, they can meet, talk and have dinner together then parents can give heartfelt advises in the formative years of a child.
In conclusion, I would argue that the advantages of traveling to work abroad with family can defeat the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'takes'.
Suggestion: takes
...nd to be numerous problems when someone take his family to another country when he w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92170818505 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69168095027 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612099644128 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0075180533 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291613990546 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843713189035 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769446123536 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161299835456 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391048276146 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.