Due to modern technology, accessible transportation, people migrate to various destinations for lucrative opportunities such as employment and et cetera. This phenomenon brings several serious consequences to these people. However, this essay illustrates some issues and feasible remedies which are associated with the migration of various regions.
To begin with, it is a fact that people move to different unique places for their quality jobs and better amenities might cause detrimental impacts, such as fundamental needs disturbances like accommodation and water utilities. To illustrate, population migration’s ratio skyrockets in Mumbai, India, for lucrative job opportunities; hence, there public suffer immensely for living accommodation and facing water shortage. Furthermore, it seems that visitors might obtain humiliation from native citizens. To exemplify, last year, twenty Africans were criticized when they were attending a business summit in Sydney, Australia. Therefore, migrating society might possess fundamental problems and racism.
However, there are numerous remedial measures which certainly curb these problems. The first and foremost solution is encouraging the native residents to share accommodation for new visitors based on renting, according to hospitality. For instance, in Beijing, China, the natives accommodate migrating people by imposing a certain amount. Besides, Countries’ administration can give a piece of punishment to reduce discrimination. For example, a decade ago, the USA government passed a law for its states to prevent segregation as this is the place, where diverse cultural citizens migrate. Thus, sharing accommodation and a few punishments definitely intercept all these arguments.
In conclusion, even though moving to new places public might face many challenges such as lack of hospitality, and criticism, there are active measures to intercept these problems like encourage sharing accommodation and some punishment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.16129032258 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29850381829 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677419354839 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.163228729 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.6 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0928728320475 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291776714532 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322741087328 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636595022305 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416255264825 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.37 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.45 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.