people use things in a short time then throw them away.
What are its causes and what are its problems?
What could be done to address this issue?
In this recent era, the trend is increasingly, which is regarding people to buy new things often. Unfortunately, this also encourages them to throw away old but useable things. So, before reaching on the conclusion, different causes and problems of this trend in the society will discuss in the passage below.
Firstly, people inclined to buy new things because of the attractive advertisements, in which manufacturers promote their new products rigorously and capitalize on the needs and wants of humanity. Furthermore, in this busy lifestyle, nobody has time to fix things that have stopped working. For instance, buying new stuff is easier than getting things repaired for busy people.
On the other hand, this trend has become a serious inflict for the environment. Therefore, when products thrown away, they produce more garbage, in which also some garbage have non-recyclable parts that will remain in the soil. As a result of this, by throwing away goods are causing damage to the environment. Moreover, excessive production of goods also leads to depletion of the natural source. For example, many trees cut down to produce various things like furniture, papers and others, it would result in the destruction of forests, if people wanted to replace their furniture more frequently.
To conclude this topic, effectiveness of this trend living in a throw-away society would be reduced by, government would implement the laws that makes mandatory for recycling and also government and NGO bodies would launch campaigns to create awareness about the dangers of throwing away goods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s recent era, the trend is increasingly, which is regarding people to buy new thi...
^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etting things repaired for busy people. On the other hand, this trend has become...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he environment. Therefore, when products thrown away, they produce more garbage, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3373015873 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83333055444 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.859409923 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.083333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16965503941 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675187070545 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465678343112 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107012296857 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346926521797 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.