Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Other think that it is better to work for different organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
In this recent eras, trend of job changing from one organisation to other company is in demand day by day. Group of people think that it is better to work for the same organisation throughout the whole working life, while other people think that it is better to work for the different companies. both the views have its own pros and cons. Therefore, before commenting on my decision both the aspects will be explained in the passage ensuing below.
First of all, in the former view, working for the same organisation, person is having lot of knowledge and experience about their company's products or services. So, they do not to be familiar about company's new product in form of how it works or how it is utilized. In addition to this, persons could be easily understand the working environment, in which they were working. Furthermore, employees would also be achieved promotion on the basis of seniority in their company. For instance, if the person is working in automobile company from the startup of their career, then they will not be require to train for using any new model of the product like cars.
On the other hand, it is required to change the organisation for gaining momentum in the career of employees. Because of changing companies, person could face new challenges and know about different innovations. As well as, it is also gaining the improvements in salary of the employee due to moving from one to another organisations. According to the survey, employees of multinational companies gained 30% more wages as compared to employees of public sector companies, the reason behind this is only about the switching their jobs from one to another companies.
To conclude this topic, in my point of view, I am inclining towards the later view regarding work for different organisations for gaining high rate of success in the job career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
...er to work for the different companies. both the views have its own pros and cons. T...
^^^^
Line 1, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...explained in the passage ensuing below. First of all, in the former view, workin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iliar about companys new product in form of how it works or how it is utilized. I...
^^
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'training'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: training
...r career, then they will not be require to train for using any new model of the product ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir jobs from one to another companies. To conclude this topic, in my point of v...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91746031746 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76538733182 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2700124988 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.642857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380424563885 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125934981622 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146862561986 0.0667982634062 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241798679209 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126494536852 0.056905535591 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.