These days people in some countries are living a throw away society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away.
What are its causes and what are its problems?
What could be done to address this issue?
In this recent era, the trend is increasingly, which is regarding people to buy new things often. Unfortunately, this also encourages them to throw away old but useable things. So, before reaching on the conclusion, different causes and problems of this trend in the society will be discussed in the passage below.
Firstly, people inclined to buy new things because of the attractive advertisements, in which manufacturers promote their new products rigorously and capitalize on the needs and wants of humanity. Furthermore, in this busy lifestyle, nobody has time to fix things that have stopped working. For instance, buying new stuff is easier than getting things repaired for busy people.
On the other hand, this trend has become a serious inflict for the environment. Therefore, when products thrown away , they produce more garbage, in which also some garbage have non-recyclable parts that will remain in the soil. As a result of this, by throwing away goods are causing damage to the environment. Moreover, excessive production of goods also leads to the depletion of the natural source. For example, many trees cut down to produce various things like furniture, papers and others, it would result in the destruction of forests.
To conclude this topic, effectiveness of this trend living in a throw-away society would be reduced by, government would implement the laws that makes mandatory for recycling and government and NGO bodies would launch campaigns to create awareness about the dangers of throwing away goods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s recent era, the trend is increasingly, which is regarding people to buy new thi...
^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the passage below. Firstly, people inclined to buy new things because of th...
^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etting things repaired for busy people. On the other hand, this trend has become...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nt. Therefore, when products thrown away , they produce more garbage, in which als...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30327868852 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85266704818 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610655737705 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.295741051 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.833333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23447737148 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084842095704 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613203620219 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143796259797 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531644773502 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.