It is often argued that people whose vocations have been chosen from an early age are more contented with their life than those who gravitate towards gaining new experience in different jobs. Personally, in my opinion, changing occupations may bring efficient career progression and better work-life balance.
To begin with, having chosen a particular job from adolescence, people cannot be sure to have the same interests or the equal strive in a couple of decades. It is hardly possible to pursue the same aspiration that would endure throughout their life. It would mean that they may be stuck in demanding jobs that no longer lead to job satisfaction. For instance, childhood dreams to become a surgeon may run up against a lot of obstacles, that efforts to overcome them might not be worth doing ongoing long-term training. Eventually, interest to be a doctor may become thing of the past. Therefore, a job that has been determined at the beginning of a career without taking into account perseverance and endeavors to stick the same path may disillusion people and do not live up to their expectations.
Furthermore, bringing new experiences into people’s life is believed to be a good way to get satisfaction. In other words, occupying a new position would lead not only to acquiring new skills that gain advantages indeed but also establishing new relationships with colleagues and useful networking. What’s more, having rich experience in different field and wide networking put an employee ahead of other making them surpassing from the crowd. It would bring about to better career progression compared with those who work without enhancing their background. In addition, looking for another job tends to mean pay increments, perks, and incentives which in term enable to improve work-life balance. It is therefore clear that gaining new experience in different jobs would efficiently contribute to moving up the ladder and satisfying work-life balance.
In conclusion, although many people believe that holding the same job from scratch may cause job satisfaction, I do not agree. I think hardly ever people are able to stay satisfied with a profession that was chosen many years ago. Conversely having gained experience and wide networking lead to a fulfilling life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'think'.
Suggestion: hardly think
...use job satisfaction, I do not agree. I think hardly ever people are able to stay satisfied ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...fession that was chosen many years ago. Conversely having gained experience and wide netwo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, if, look, may, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21739130435 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9154354229 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567934782609 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8712215062 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.941176471 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6470588235 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.47058823529 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266028817011 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825738380565 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569005899177 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170762789252 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505973155316 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.