It is often maintained that fast food has a detrimental influence on the environment, people’s diets, and family relationships. I firmly agree with these statements; in my opinion, it exacerbates pollution and has a negative knock-on effect on people’s lives.
To begin with, convenience food implies overpacking, which in many cases is disposable and non-bio-gradable. This is because plastic is the only known material with waterproof and sealed features that in turn are vital to preserving freshness. Thus, consuming junk food may eventually bring about increasing household waste and polluted landfills. Ultimately, it might be widespread in the ocean and contaminate water and the whole flora and fauna.
Furthermore, fast food contains a lot of chemical additives and flavor enhancers that may lead to addiction among consumers and eating disorders. It would mean that people no longer would enjoy a healthy meal if they would not involve pungent tastes caused by chemicals that kept food fresh and appealing. What is more, prepared food is high-calorie dishes, which tend to lead to gaining weight and having prolonged effects on health like obesity and heart disease.
Finally, lack of family gatherings during the preparation of food as well as mutual meals appears to influence family bonding. What I mean by this, the mutual pastime is believed to be a good way to form a close relationship between members of families. It is the very time where relatives may share their news and concerns. Therefore, whether cooking or eating home food has a beneficial effect on establishing close family ties and creating a close-knit family.
In conclusion, the consumption of fast food gives rise to detrimental effects on nature and people’s surroundings. I support this opinion and believe it aggravates contamination and would have dire consequences on people’s health and ruin family interactions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, i mean, in conclusion, as well as, in many cases, in my opinion, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08590163305 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626666666667 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.050283199 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.8 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207305484163 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063449400567 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462089536356 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110331783478 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035937362589 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.