Many people think that keeping the wild animal at the zoos has good reasons. Do you agree or disagree?
Conventional wisdom holds that zoos have important functions by having wild animals. Although undoubtedly, they make a huge contribution to breeding programs for endangered species and providing a safe environment, I believe that imprisoning animals for any reason is simply wrong.
To begin with, despite the useful breeding functions particularly for endangered species that suffer from finding mates and breeding, the majority of captive breeding programs would hardly release animals back into the wild. This is because it may jeopardize them in a world full of predators and poaching. Moreover, most of the species might be sold not only to other zoos but also to circuses or hunting ranches due to high demand and a huge profit. For instance, in the US and South Africa, the wealthy public is enabled to kill animals in a fenced enclosure paining a lot of money. Therefore, supporting international breeding programs does not guarantee subsequent welfare of wild animals.
Furthermore, often animals from zoos no longer can live without human assistance. It would mean that besides zoos would enable these species to live and breed in a secure environment, they deprive them of natural needs either in hunting or in feeding. In addition, they still cannot come close to creating the space and freedom that animals have in natural habitats. Even the best artificial environments hardly ever would replace wild nature. For this reason, it is noticed that capturing animals may give rise to the development of mental illnesses and stress diseases. To illustrate, the life expectancy of marine mammals is decreased by decades in comparison wild relatives. It is therefore clear that safe artificial environments partly might be a sound reason.
In conclusion, although the momentous functions of zoos bring plenty of benefits, from my point of view it may give rise to negative trend such as the business of selling or killing surplus animals after breeding as well as deprivation of natural habitats and there are no important reasons to forgive them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23636363636 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80491500929 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5834909008 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.2 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1469547399 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499353702863 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224353656048 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944497078855 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214844238947 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.