People who have original ideas are of much greater value to society than those who are simply able to copy the ideas of others well.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Determining the value of an individual to the society has been a debatable topic in this century. Many people assure that citizens who possess unprecedented ideas should be admired more than ordinary people who are just the imitators. In my opinion, I absolutely agree with this notion because there is no reason to quarrel against this.
To start with, extraordinary people are rare and consequential to the renovation of contemporary society. Firstly, eminent inventions are the key that induce humanity to such a modern life with manifold of incredible technology. In fact, thanks to the born of internet and robotic techniques, we are coming closer to the fifth industrial revolution. Secondly, people with exceptional talents would be ideal tutors to the young generation because they can teach the young citizens not only critical thinking skills but they can also share their profound sagacity related to their profession.
On the other hand, cherishing successful people and allocate them high social statuses could be an out of the box idea to motivate other citizens. To disclose this, people usually have tendency to be eager with things that they cannot afford for, including intangible and tangible value. Because of this, ordinary employees would easily envy respected and wealthy people, thus make these normal citizens have a motivation to keep moving forward. Beside, the privileged who have achieved prestige achievements would be imitated or be studied by others. For example, people can learn from the success of eminent individuals to develop their own careers or can comprehend from existed inventions to create unprecedented inventions.
In conclusion, while there are several convincing arguments on both sides of the debate, ignoring the social value of outstanding people would surely be a mistake. Although it might be not a holistic perspective, I believe these citizens deserve the prestige positions in the community because not only
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itions in the community because not only
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41233766234 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83275266969 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62987012987 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4739912927 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.071428571 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198036237275 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660739332651 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553645972839 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122901215105 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914065309897 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.