A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion

In today's world, it is common to see that affluent people who own several luxurious things are represented as the gem of the society, but the one who has the greatest and most precious traits such as warmheartedness and trustworthiness are largely being ignored by modern people. This essay will highlight both issues and explain why I believe that money is indispensable, on the contrary values and kindness are the most auspicious jewellery that hardly one can have.

To start with, there are numerous reasons behind respecting and giving extra emphasis to financially rich personality in society. Firstly, in this competitive time, everyone wants to shrink their boundaries with financially established people so that business skills can be learned. Secondly, a plethora of others believes that developing friendship with rich people can improvetheir goodwill in society. Thirdly, the most common factor is that a considerable number of folks run behind wealthy members of the society for selfishness due to the fact they think that making strong relation or valuing rich ones can be beneficial for them in their hardship they might get financial support when needed.

On the other hand, a new trend is going on in the community to devalue the people who are not financially established, but one thing today's community is forgetting that certain other qualities can be laid in that person such as strong moral and ethical values which is extremely crucial in developing real characteristics. Which may not be present in affluent people. It said in Bhagavad Geeta that moral and ethical value is the real character of a human being money and all belonging are left behind the death, and later it becomes someone else possessions, therefore, it is human's duty to choose the right path, and they should respect such people who own these qualities.

In conclusion, although, money indeed plays a significant role in today's world yet valuing people based on materialistic possession is not justifiable, our society should treat all human equally. It does not matter whether they are rich or poor.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ial in developing real characteristics. Which may not be present in affluent people. ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary, to start with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21893491124 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1625710549 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582840236686 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.5344968957 49.4020404114 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.363636364 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7272727273 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8181818182 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110846388868 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423602039473 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.019237421487 0.0667982634062 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638739623769 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190265796912 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.