Petrol price
One of the most effective ways to decrease the volume of traffic and the relevant air pollution is increasing the price of fuels like petrol.
Nowadays, cars are part of our daily activities in which for use of fossil oriented fuels same as petrol or gasoline, the air pollution generated by transportation systems is still as one of the major problems, especially in large and crowded cities.
I agree with this idea as a preventive method because it forces people to use fewer cars while traffic jams and air pollution will be declined. For example, if each person has to pay more money for petrol, he will persuade to use public transportation instead of his own car. Another positive impact is that people tend to use their cars with more control because of financial considerations. As an instance, they will not use their cars on unnecessary cases or to do some routine and daily jobs same as daily shopping or picking the children up from the schools.
On the other hand, there are some negative points about this method. Some people have to use their cars because it is a part of their job. So, increasing the petrol price is not fair for them and will make lots of issues in their life. In addition, it would be better we can find a beneficial solution for all the people in society. This way will not affect the wealthy and seniors, although will have a direct effect on living situation among the majority of people who do not have enough welfare on their life.
Therefore, we should look for better ways to fix this problem. As an instance, producing high-quality petrol, using electric cars instead of petrol cars, improving public transportation systems, and training the people about proper use of personal transportation vehicles are some alternative methods to decrease traffic in cities.
Increasing the price of petrol is one of the solutions to control and decrease using cars. I agree with it, however, I think it is not the best and permanent method. So, we must find other alternative ways to have more control over traffic and a more substantial decrease in air pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 224, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'persuade' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...more money for petrol, he will persuade to use public transportation instead of his ow...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, still, therefore, while, as to, for example, i think, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82369146006 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65646741566 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490358126722 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8001881268 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186419461513 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766107874394 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118185348843 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128240409803 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734283923386 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.