At the present time, the population of some countries include a large number of young people, compared with number of old people. Do the advantage of this situation outweigh the disadvantages.
Human lifestyle is changed over a couple of decades. Presently, in many countries the strength of young people are more than old one. Here, I would like to account that this trend has more benefits than drawback.
There are manifold advantages of this phenomenon. First and foremost, working sector can boost the productivity with the help of young generation. To illustrate, young employees are more active, stamina,energy and they have more work efficiency, more accuracy in work. Therefore, young people are boon for the working sector. What is more, young generation are technically advance therefore, they have more innovative ideas and strategies to work and unlike old people they easily accepted modern way and communicate all around the world make healthy relation with other nation .As a result, nation can prosperous under the presence of young people.
Numerous points can be mentioned to endorse the disadvantages of having more young people in a nation.intially, young generation are unable to preserve the culture and moral values if a nation.To be specific, youngster have orthodox thinking they do not give more importance to culture and they prefer new way of living instead of using traditional methods. Thus, the culture of a nation army at the low ebb under the presence of more youngters.Furthermore, administration find difficulties to confer job opportunities due to over population of youngsters.more young people create the problem of unemployment, scarcity, population, and many others.
To recapitulate, undeniably, there are some drawbacks of more young people.However,still I believe that it's advantages outweigh it's disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , energy
...young employees are more active, stamina,energy and they have more work efficiency, mor...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... make healthy relation with other nation .As a result, nation can prosperous under...
^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...ake healthy relation with other nation .As a result, nation can prosperous under t...
^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...he culture and moral values if a nation.To be specific, youngster have orthodox t...
^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es if a nation.To be specific, youngster have orthodox thinking they do not give ...
^^
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...bb under the presence of more youngters.Furthermore, administration find difficulties to co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...are some drawbacks of more young people.However,still I believe that its advantages out...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , still
...e drawbacks of more young people.However,still I believe that its advantages outweigh ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55294117647 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38493848322 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592156862745 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 110.901639094 49.4020404114 224% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 128.727272727 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159293370054 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703453251235 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05445287652 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113328039833 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549973062275 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.