some people believe that Olympics games do not have a role in the 21st century. do you u agree or disagree with the statement.
Games play a magnificent role to uplift the standard of a nation. Presently, some proportion of masses assert that organising Olympic games in native country is not a fruitful idea. Here, I would like to discord with the given statement.
Magnificent points are there to support my point of view. First and foremost, Olympics games in native country help young people to depict talent and achieve name and fame. For example, ample of sports players can get opportunity to play games and earn two square meal for family members simultaneously they are outshine the name of a nation by winning prizes and medals. Therefore, Olympics games are imperative for both nation and players. Moreover, Olympics games in native country invites the foreign revenue. To demonstrate, millions of affluent people from other nation visit in native country for watching the Olympics games and spent a hefty amount of money on distinct sources such as transportation, accommodation, and many others. A country can enhance the economy by organising Olympics games.
Further emphasising on my point of view. Olympic Games are the fabulous source of amusement as folks from all over the world can get chance to interact with people of different culture. Apart from it, people have hectic schedule they do not have sufficient time to relish with their near and dear ones. Through Olympic games they can meet with friends and cheer up the favorite player. Hence, Olympics games in native country is lucrative idea for people.
To recapitulate, sports confer a great deal of knowledge as well as amusement. With my perception, Olympics games play a paramount role for the prosperous of a nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outshined', 'outshone'.
Suggestion: outshined; outshone
... family members simultaneously they are outshine the name of a nation by winning prizes ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...onomy by organising Olympics games. Further emphasising on my point of view. Olympi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14598540146 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69488418438 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558394160584 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6977717017 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9411764706 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1176470588 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257783059941 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851138291528 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546135454539 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168867438596 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504289634809 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.