Each society has been determined by its citizens’ features such as age, population and so forth. Nowadays, the number of new generation is more than population of older people in some countries, which is a positive point due to work. In this essay, both side of views will be discussed as well as my opinion.
On the one hand, old people is known as treasure for each society because of their experiences. They could be an efficient leader for young generation to advise them and show which ways would be better to catch the destination. Although having old people is necessary regard to mention items, in modern era, young generation does not follow the elders’ advices and they prefer to increase their knowledge throughout book and educational courses. Therefore, the old population is not as important as young generation is.
On the other hand, young people plays an important role as workforce in every society. They are both mentally and physically prepared for any activities in comparison with elders, the international competition is the clear evidence. For this reason, most of countries that have less young people encourage overseas youths to migrate. Additionally, the technology has changed rapidly and needs people to company with it; however, old people refuse to get along with the revolution of information.
In conclusion, although one of the necessities in each society is probably old generation, I believe the foundation of society is work and juveniles are the engine of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...y, both side of views will be discussed as well as my opinion. On the one hand, old peopl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the countries') or simply say ''most countries''.
Suggestion: most of the countries; most countries
...is the clear evidence. For this reason, most of countries that have less young people encourage o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16260162602 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91780451446 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60162601626 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0222810491 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.833333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113426385731 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441299856042 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408320218958 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641959842401 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468339251058 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.