There are many courses available in the modern education system, and the right selection is of paramount importance in delivering effective lessons. Some people argue that it is crucial for pupils to spend a substantial proportion of their school time on studying history, others, however, think that it is wasting the time and science and technology related courses should be priorities in school curriculum. In this essay, I will explore both sides of the debate and explain my support for the latter view.
On the one hand, it might be said that history conveys our ancestor’s mistakes and it would be advantageous if it is studied in details by pupils. In addition, it may be said that studying history by students in school, gives them the opportunity of grasping that how social and cultural conditions been in their generation’s era. However, knowing our parents’ shortcomings can be achieved through watching films or reading magazines, which are affordable and easier. Added to this, owing to many disparities in social and cultural criteria between our period and pasts, it may not be helpful for our younger individuals to know about them.
On the other hand, many enhancements in people’s lives can be driven by the advances in technology and science. We are living in the modern era and it is inevitable that science and knowledge can be recognized as undoubted vital tools in developed countries. If a country is powerful in science and have up-to-date technology, they will not probably be under the threat of social unrest and economic instabilities. Moreover, science and technology bring peace and convenience for people. To clarify this, mobile phones are results of enhances in knowledge and industry, which not only have made the life easier in different aspects, but also enable people to be informed about disputes and other crucial issues globally, leading to higher levels of political and social awareness. As a result of above-mentioned arguments, it would be vital for school pupils to allocate a considerable amount of their time to courses based on science and technology.
In conclusion, although it would be a positive attitude to recognize history related issues, it could be attained through watching films and reading notes and history courses are not needed to be developed by pedagogical experts. Moreover, regarding the detrimental roles of science and technology in today’s globe, they must be integral parts of school’s subjects’ syllabus and be comprehended by students perfectly.
- The diagram below shows how geothemal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- It is difficult for people in the cities to get enough physical exercise. What are the causes and solution? 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 78
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...explain my support for the latter view. On the one hand, it might be said that h...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31034482759 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05922832018 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532019704433 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.5690924642 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.733333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0666666667 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170018588297 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613378474323 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461704501796 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110383022014 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368901986014 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.