At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults. Compare with number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantage?
It is reported that there is a massive growing in number of young people rather than aging people in some nations around the world. There is no doubt that many demerits are brought by this situation in compare of merits. In this essay I will put reasons to support my view before arriving at conclusion.
Although young generation society means joyful and content country, this generation need various facilities during their life long. Adolescent society will be faced many dilemma in terms of finding suitable career, universities competitions, residential areas, food limitation and overpopulation due to more children will be generated. These kind of Barriers are result of hug number of demands in specific time period. Therefore government should budget more for meeting their fundamental needs .
An other reason for my position is restriction in expert labors. When a city is full of immature people in work fields, companies will confront with lack of professional employee. So many drawbacks can be predicted and evaluated. For instance, incompetent managers, unqualified teachers or in efficient doctors who will brought many expenses to being enough qualified in their occupations.
Moreover overpopulation which will be happened by young people needs to use a great deal of natural resources. For example the young generations for meeting their daily necessities should use more fuel fossils. If natural fuel is used quickly, it will pose devastating effect on future life.
In conclusion, based on above consideration, I personally believe that the disadvantage of imbalance in age of population have more detrimental consequences in human’s life in compare of it advantageous. Overpopulation in young generation can lead society to having more difficulties in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld. There is no doubt that many demerits are brought by this situation in compare...
^^
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...due to more children will be generated. These kind of Barriers are result of hug number of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 421, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ber of demands in specific time period. Therefore government should budget more for meeti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 496, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...more for meeting their fundamental needs . An other reason for my position is re...
^^
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: Another
...for meeting their fundamental needs . An other reason for my position is restriction i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enough qualified in their occupations. Moreover overpopulation which will be ha...
^^
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ough qualified in their occupations. Moreover overpopulation which will be happened b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d use more fuel fossils. If natural fuel is used quickly, it will pose devastatin...
^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ead society to having more difficulties in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47826086957 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08593949811 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641304347826 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1672513719 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14903206448 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479533283957 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513999152043 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868190094067 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697752093493 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.