From last few years above topic is catching significant attention of public. It is very hot topic that why certain professions like doctors, nurses teachers and engineers are under paid than the professionals like sports personalities and entertainment world. Although, when we discuss deeper about this topic, we could see that the difference of the annual income of both kind of profession is really unjustified and unacceptable.
First of all, when we bring our notice to the profession like doctors, nurses, teachers and engineers, we could clearly see that they are really qualified people. Through out their life they have studied and after a great hard work they got their degree. This is reasonable to expect that after such hard work they should get a good annual income. They are main pillars of our society. Our society is vitally depend on those community helpers. In fact, people who are highly paid like actors are also depend on them. For instance, when actor or a player is sick, he/she wont be able to perform, unless they see a doctor. Furthermore, engineers and teachers are also equally important for the society. For example, a good sport teacher is the one who can create a good athlete , who can make our country very proud.
On the other hand, income of other professions like actors or international players is tremendously high that no one can beat that. However, at some extent this income is justify, when we talk about our international players, who made us proud on international level. At the same time, life of people from entertainment world is not that easy. In order to get that fame and to reach to that point of fame, they have to scarifies their private life. To maintain that position , they have to make a lot of effort. Celebrities are not even able to roam around freely because of media and their followers.
On the conclusion, I would like to say that annual income of celebrities are acceptable, only the difference between the salaries of both professions should be less. As both are equally important profession for our society and efforts fro both the professions are equal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: Throughout
... that they are really qualified people. Through out their life they have studied and after ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
... of our society. Our society is vitally depend on those community helpers. In fact, pe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...ho are highly paid like actors are also depend on them. For instance, when actor or a ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...is the one who can create a good athlete , who can make our country very proud. ...
^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'justified'.
Suggestion: justified
... However, at some extent this income is justify, when we talk about our international p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'scarify'.
Suggestion: scarify
...ach to that point of fame, they have to scarifies their private life. To maintain that po...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... private life. To maintain that position , they have to make a lot of effort. Cele...
^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
... profession for our society and efforts fro both the professions are equal.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, really, so, for example, for instance, in fact, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90027700831 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68283636674 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523545706371 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8020099995 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.45 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143352296647 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419355958521 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597430711163 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886093642504 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395694637168 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.