It is generally accepted that the polllution is obviously increased by the private transports contamination. Some people hold onto notion that the government should invest the budget for enlargement of public transportation system while other may oppose that the government should emerged to the electronic car system. Still, personally, I completely agree with the idea that the government should venture the budget to the public transports. This essay is going to establish the reasons behind the idea.
Various points could endorse the benefits of developing public transports. The first reason to consider is that the public transports can reduce the air pollution. Research conducted by Oxford university indicates that in 2019, Bangkok where fillled of pollution in the air or called p.m 2.5, need to diminish the private car in order to alleviate the traffic and air pollution. If people only use the public transport, the air pollution will be decrease.
There is many more benefits of advancing in public transport. There is no denying the fact that using publich transport can cost less budget, nevertheless, using private cars are cost an enormous of paper money. However, various people are using the public car system which can be lack of qualiti. Thereby, if the government don't invest the money to develop the public transports, people will reverse to use their own car and will extening of air pollution.
However, some opponents may argue that the electric car should be developed by government as it can minus the cause of pollution. Perhaps, this seems to be initially plausible, but it cannot be denied that developing of the electronics car spend an immensely of money and time. The world could be worse till the government can develop it. Furthuermore, developing of public cars can be short-term developing to save people from wosely pollution.
To conclude, it likely seems to be understanable that the public cars transport can reduce an air pollution more rapidly than eletronic cars. The challenge for the government is to take a chance to devolop the best transportation to diminish the pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'transports'' or 'transport's'?
Suggestion: transports'; transport's
...n is obviously increased by the private transports contamination. Some people hold onto no...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... of qualiti. Thereby, if the government dont invest the money to develop the public ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 92, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'air pollution'.
Suggestion: air pollution
...at the public cars transport can reduce an air pollution more rapidly than eletronic cars. The c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23906705539 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85921267325 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6093178697 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315412766769 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109373845435 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512823147913 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184530107983 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034129963333 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.