Public museum and art will not be needed because people can use Internet to see the historical objects. Do you agree?
In the threshold of the new era, every image of historical evidences seems to be available on the Internet. Therefore, whether should museums and art galleries be replaced is a highly debated issue. My view is that these building should not be demolished due to its advantages.
It is irrefutable that museums and art galleries provide an array of benefits to the tourism industry. In this regards, in order to understand a country customs, these are the destinations which all foreigners visited when they first come to a nation. Therefore, this plays a vital role in the income of tourist companies. not the mention that some places are well-known heritages. Furthermore, they are legacies of the next generation and holding the cultural indentity as well. To illustrate, if the Vietnamese National Museum is destroyed, the youngsters might soon forget about the history because observation is the best teacher. As a result, they could only see it artificially and would not feel proud of it. Thus, the idea that preserve the existances of museums should be strictly remained.
Despite its obvious positive effects, remaining too many historical buildings might pose threats to a country. Particularly, some buildings are too spacious and crowed so that they regularly cause traffic congestion. Nevatheless, this problem might be solved quickly.
In conclusion, it can be said that historical places still play important roles on preserving a nation culture. By doing so, we firmly sure that the uniqueness of countries will not disappear.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...of benefits to the tourism industry. In this regards, in order to understand a count...
^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'custom'?
Suggestion: custom
...gards, in order to understand a country customs, these are the destinations which all f...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Not
...ole in the income of tourist companies. not the mention that some places are well-k...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27935222672 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94198021516 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63967611336 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3797798338 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.5 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4375 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190589704245 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536089460546 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451419356173 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111698998813 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477721477871 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.