It is often said that scientific technology plays a prominent role in society. Due to this phenomenon, the amount and quality of food change in the way of public purchasing. However, some people accept this change as a definite improvement, whereas their counterparts state this modification is detrimental.
On the one hand, It is often said that technology and scientific advances bring numerous benefits for communities. Due to this progression in scientific technology, scientists, biologists, and botanists harvest excess quantity and quality of food within a short period. To elaborate, in Laboratories, scientists experiment on gene therapy on plants which might cultivate on any land, even on drought-prone areas. In addition to this, some plant diseases are prevented at early stages with scientific technology. Therefore, crops flourish and produce excess food for the communities.
On the other hand, even though scientific technology has positive, there are negatives which are associated with advances in technology, such as it develops health problems to people. Spraying numerous pesticides on crops to prevent microorganisms might produce adulterated food, which leads to some severe health hazards, such as obesity, heart problems, and early stage of Visual impairments when communities consume this non-organic food frequently. Furthermore, forcefully harvesting crops within a short period than the average cultivating period with scientific technology advances might cause ecological imbalance. Therefore, certain parts of the world were abandoned scientific technology on food production.
In conclusion, to my mind, technology and scientific advances on food production have its own merits and demerits.positives such as excess food production and negatives like health hazards. It seems scientific technology should utilize wisely based on communities requirement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve its own merits and demerits.positives such as excess food production and negat...
^^
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communities'' or 'community's'?
Suggestion: communities'; community's
...chnology should utilize wisely based on communities requirement.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97426470588 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2526419093 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569852941176 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.147273242 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.071428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217957527959 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814287924685 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486645017874 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147199643623 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648741313856 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.