The range and quality of food we can buy has changed due to technological and scientific advances. Some people believe the range and quality of food has improved, while others consider it may be harmful.
Discuss both point of view and give your opinion.
There is no doubt that the sort of food and its quality has evolved with the advent of cutting-edge technologies and scientific improvements. While some people argue that the variety and quality of food have enhanced, others claim that it might be hazardous for society. this essay will explore both sides of this view and support for the first argument.
To begin with, in modern times, food has turned enormously due to the development of technologies that are able to modify food genetics. Consequently, much more variety of dishes have been generated than in former times. On top of that, laboratories have accomplished better control of nutrients, as they can be managed electronically and supplied to the food in exact values, for this reason the quality is higher. The prime example of this is the P and G food company that makes 100% of their food by computers, thus all their products have exactly the amount of nutrients the package says, therefore they have been awarded as the most valuable food enterprises in the world.
turning to the other side of the argument, food modified by technology may cause a potential damage to people due to the addition of preservatives in order to provide prolonged food longevity. To illustrate this, it has been proven that any packaged product that we could find in a supermarket contains plenty of preservatives. As a result, some people think that this kind of extra product could represent a harm to the individuals health. However, there are no sufficient scientific proves of organic diseases caused by conservants.
In my opinion, the management of food by technology might be beneficial to humans, owing to the fact that nowadays computers are capable to produce and generate several types of food and in addition they can calculate the perfect content of nutrients it should contain.
To conclude, both type and quality of food has been influenced by the advances of technology. In my opinion computers have permitted an improvement of both parameters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...that it might be hazardous for society. this essay will explore both sides of this v...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Turning
...le food enterprises in the world. turning to the other side of the argument, food...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'potential damage'.
Suggestion: potential damage
..., food modified by technology may cause a potential damage to people due to the addition of preser...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 422, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...a product could represent a harm to the individuals health. However, there are no sufficien...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 486, Rule ID: PROVE_PROOF[2]
Message: Did you mean 'proofs' (noun) instead of proves (verb)?
Suggestion: proofs
...ver, there are no sufficient scientific proves of organic diseases caused by conservan...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, kind of, no doubt, sort of, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07784431138 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87774239106 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6527470961 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297876294404 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102459287853 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679521151278 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169668484994 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403669145496 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.