In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e-books rather than paper-based books.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In current decades, more and more society are prefer to read e-books rather than read from paper-based books. I personally assure that the use of e-book has more positive merits than its unfavorable impacts. This essay would discuss about this topic in more details.
First of all, e-book is far more light weight than physic book. The only thing to access and explore e-book is just our electronic gadget, such as laptop, tablet, and smart phone. This positive feature could improve society's life. For instance, people could read many books without feels worry that they have to bring those heavy books wherever they go. They just have to bring they smart phone and read wherever and whenever they want.
Secondly, there has been sophisticated advancement on applications to explore e-books. Those updated applications such as online book, Adobe Reader, and Google Books support world wide communities to read electronic books. This could be seen with the technological advancement in their features. Reader could highlight and make notes on their e-books. This feature is more beneficial since reader does not have to bring another stationery. Furthermore, they do not have to spend their money on such things, they could save more to buy more e-books or other useful needs. Although e-book has many merits, it still has one drawback. Reader could not open two selected pages at the same time. Meanwhile, with physic book, reader could easily open any two or even more selected pages. But this do not have to be worried by communities, because the developer of the applications are working with their best work to overcome such problem.
In conclusion, reading e-books have more positive and beneficial impacts for us rather than physic books. People could read and access e-books with just one simple gadget. In addition to this, people could improve their knowledge by reading more e-books on their gadget.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'preferred'.
Suggestion: preferred
...rent decades, more and more society are prefer to read e-books rather than read from p...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...ls. First of all, e-book is far more light weight than physic book. The only thing to acc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ooks. Those updated applications such as I books, Adobe Reader, and Google Books ...
^^^
Line 6, column 3, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'book'
Suggestion: book
... Those updated applications such as I books, Adobe Reader, and Google Books support...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, still, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09748427673 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39502313835 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522012578616 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8549020428 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.6818181818 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4545454545 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323026997716 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107996305352 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109552479465 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208297555417 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127893356758 0.056905535591 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.