In today’s rapidly changing globalized world, change in structure of a family and role of the members has become one of the pressing issue, requires immediate attention. From last few decades because of the modernization of society , manifold significant changes are coming in the lifestyle of people. However, it is the fact that one of the prominent reason behind the change in over all life of individual or society is higher level of education.
First of all, when we discuss the life of ancient people, we could see that there were trend of joint family. People used to live in one house with at least three generations. Although there are myriad of advantage in living with grand parents, uncles and cousins, still people started preferring living in nuclear family. In joint families , males are the main bread earner and all the ladies are home makers. People in joint families were vitally dependent on each other, hence they used to share special bonds with each other.
On the other hand, nevertheless, I strongly believe that the main reason behind nuclear family is modernization of society and equalization in gender. In new era everyone has right to get higher education. Hence , in every family there are more than one bread earner. According to a survey, in some nuclear families, father is taking care of kids and house, at the same time mother is the one who earns money for family. Therefore, in recent years , we could observe that society’s mind set is changing in positive way.
In the conclusion, I would like to mention that it is reasonable to say that joint family and nuclear family both have there own advantages and disadvantages. I firmly believe that to ameliorate the situation, society would take necessary action by several effective ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... because of the modernization of society , manifold significant changes are coming...
^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people. However, it is the fact that one of the prominent reason behind the chang...
^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...there was trend of joint family. People use to live in one house with at least thre...
^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing in nuclear family. In joint families , males are the main bread earner and all...
^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...has right to get higher education. Hence , in every family they have more than one...
^^
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y for family. Therefore, in recent years , we could observe that society's mi...
^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...int family and nuclear family both have there own advantages and disadvantages. I firmly ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssary action by several effective ways.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, at least, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03691275168 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68019103286 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580536912752 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7090663945 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.066666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138980989007 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457574284187 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603736202052 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872703472296 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668543172389 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.