Recently,There has had some news about cartoons for the kids.Today,Youtube-one of the famous website in over the world, has appeared violentvideos such as slayer or some killing videos.What is the solution of this problem ?Do you think our government shou

Essay topics:

Recently,There has had some news about cartoons for the kids.Today,
Youtube-one of the famous website in over the world, has appeared violent
videos such as slayer or some killing videos.
What is the solution of this problem ?Do you think our government should
intervene to solve this problem seriously ?
Write an essay at least 350 words

As we know it, youtube is a famous application worldwide.The kids are all up for entertainment such as: watching cartoons,….. But behind the good, there are also bad things that affect children. Recently, animation of children on YouTube has shown. Scenes of deadly violence. And it have bad videos affecting small children watching cartoons.
Videos on YouTube appear violent. On it there are challenges full of danger and in it is done by children. Gazy challenging videos such as: a pig challenge. There was a young man who had crawled into the pigsty and lived like a pig for 24 hours.Likewise, dog challenge live coffin challenge, live underground challenge……Young people do it and turn up and put on YouTube.YouTube kids is the main development app for google kids running on both android and ios platforms. This is considered a variation of the YouTube videos for children. However, in fact, YouTube is completely harmless. Previously, YouTube kids have been repeated accrued. Because it posted there videos harm for children.
So what are its solution ? According to online reading statistics many people have invented highly advanced applications. According to Mr Le Minh Hung, he will build a technology application AL (Artificial intelligence). It will remove bad murder videos on YouTube. And Mr Nguyen Khanh Trinh advertised applications clever-ads. About the TT-TT agency will ask you tube remove features suggest with violation notification channels. Not for user repost clip violate.
Through it, youtube is not only beneficial in every way but it is also harmful to us. Families with young children should pay more attention to watching Youtube.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...utube is a famous application worldwide.The kids are all up for entertainment such ...
^^^
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...entertainment such as: watching cartoons,….. But behind the good, there are also b...
^^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...tertainment such as: watching cartoons,….. But behind the good, there are also bad...
^^
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...hown. Scenes of deadly violence. And it have bad videos affecting small children wat...
^^^^
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Likewise
...igsty and lived like a pig for 24 hours.Likewise, dog challenge live coffin challenge, l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 321, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Young
... challenge, live underground challenge……Young people do it and turn up and put on You...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: YouTube
...le do it and turn up and put on YouTube.YouTube kids is the main development app for go...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, so, in fact, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30566037736 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15312027184 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645283018868 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.4500917291 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.9090909091 106.682146367 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.0454545455 20.7667163134 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120752745765 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366507586904 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380893368928 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626394821774 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316750663847 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.63 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.