Research has shown that the transportation of products and people is the main source of pollution. Some people believe the government should be in charge of this, while others believe it is the fault of individuals.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
The transportation of products and people is that main source of pollution is what recent research has shown. This essay will discuss whether the government should be in charge of this or if the people must take responsibility.
The rise in pollution is a concern for every single one of us. Some believe that the government must be held responsible for this. As the governing body, they must take measures to prevent unnecessary pollution from vehicles during transport. One way this can be done is for public transport to be more efficient, reliable and comfortable so that people will be incentivised to take public transport instead of their own vehicles. The government can also make the public transport vehicles more eco-friendly so as to further reduce the emissions produced by transport vehicles.
While some believe that the government is responsible, others believe that every individual must hold themselves responsible. Even if public transport is provided, the people must choose to use it rather than take their own vehicles. If they do not wish to use public transport they must try to use a method known as carpooling where a group of people headed towards the same locality use a single vehicle owned by one of them thereby reducing the number of vehicles on the road and emissions. Use of cycles and walking must be implemented when going to nearby places.
In conclusion, while both views have valid points, my opinion is that each individual must take responsibility for their actions and come together to help reduce the number of vehicles on the road. Doing this will reduce the pollution due to transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ic transport vehicles more eco-friendly so as to further reduce the emissions produced b...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04779411765 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86779552783 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2128797516 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.615384615 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15384615385 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348458442416 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13626553327 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102973380684 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23466479028 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127580963992 0.056905535591 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.