Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience
Development is one of the most powerful weapon which can be used to change the scenario of the country point one of the most controversial issue today relates to that government should either spend money on Restoration of old buildings or on building new houses and dudes? I completely disagree with the given statement and give reasons for my answer through some examples and assertions in the further piece of essay.
The first step to understand that, how it is beneficial to reconstruct buildings rather than constructing new roads and houses? Broadly speaking, the prominent reason is useful material. While, there are some old buildings which are made by expensive raw material and can be used in new building as well. Similarly, there are old building which are well known by people and refurbishment of those buildings can be useful for government because people often visit them. In addition, reconstruction expenditure on these buildings will be less because of the quantity of material which they have to apply will be less. For instance, workers can use preserved things for the refurbishment of buildings as in new buildings there is need for new material and expense will be more.
The second step to understand that, why constructing new houses and roads is not significant with the money of government? The foremost reason is environment and expenditure. If government will apply money on making new houses than there has to be availability of land and there will be more construction of houses which can put detrimental effects on the natural beauty or landscape of the environment. Moreover, government have to spend money on every part of the house for its construction so that would be full of expenditure. On the same token, roads can be also built with the money of road tax which is taken from the public. Hence, this shows that constructing new houses can be spend more money for they establishment.
In conclusion, I tend to believe that, construction of new houses and roads is inescapable, but if government will construct to houses and roads than that would be more expensive, compared to refurbishment of building. As a result government can provide professional works to reconstruct buildings which can make the expense more less.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: ON_THE_SAME_TOKEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'by the same token'?
Suggestion: By the same token
...n so that would be full of expenditure. On the same token, roads can be also built with the money...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...ct buildings which can make the expense more less.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, well, while, as to, broadly speaking, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05333333333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96190449242 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458666666667 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1411355767 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.4375 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356178702649 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137271498618 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578589055895 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232947431184 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422066786469 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.