The chart below gives information about southland main exports in 2000, 20.... and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant.(20... for test purposes, use and refer t

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about southland main exports in 2000, 20.... and future projections for 2025.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant.

(20... for test purposes, use and refer to Current year)

The supplied histogram delineates the information about, main exports in 2000, 2018 and future projections of 2025 in southland. The data is calibrated in billions, which is clearly and coherently represented.

To comments with, It is seen that, in a 2000 maximum exports were of international tourism with quantity of 8 billion and minimum exporting was of meat products which was 2 billion less then International tourism. Further more, in the current year 2018, dairy products are highly exported with 19.9 billion, while meat products are less exported with quantity of 5.5 billion approximately.

Probing ahead, It is seen that, in the future projection of 2025 exporting of international tourism and dairy products will be with 10 billion and 9.5 billion respectively and meat products will be 4 billion less than international tourism.

Overall, it is evident that, meat products are all products which are exported least as compared to other products as they are not exported more than the quantity of 6 billion during all the given years in southland's main exportation.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... meat products which was 2 billion less then International tourism. Further more, in...
^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is evident that, meat products are all products which are exported least as com...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 1615.20841683 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 173.0 315.596192385 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28901734104 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96185106469 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 176.041082164 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520231213873 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 506.74238477 51% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3516637866 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.5 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121346292854 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090818888845 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115496724005 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10629320497 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867447459288 0.056905535591 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 78.4519038076 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.