The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments' expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The development of modern buildings and pathways is immensely important, yet it generates arguments about whether the ancient ones should not be reconstructed. Thousands of these buildings are being destroyed to make space for the more functional ones. Personally, I think this action should be ceased.
The intention of urbanization is upstanding: it is built to be mostly beneficial for people’s lives. Modern buildings are simpler and cheaper to construct as they would not require such sophistication compare to ancient buildings. Indeed, these buildings are more multifunctional, like a skyscraper can be an accommodation, workplace and a supermarket; which will reduce a lot of space within an overcrowded city. Furthermore, new pathways can withstand a significantly larger amount of transportations, preventing traffic congestions and time consumption.
However, old buildings define a nation’s cultural aspects, and must not be neglected by this vision. The ancient construction is a meticulous work of creativity and time, and an inspiration towards the city’s civilians. Moreover, despite the cost of restoration, these buildings can attract tourists, which is advantageous for the economy of a country. When a meaningful historical construction is widely publicized, individuals from all over the world would surge to it. For instance, the Notre Dame of Paris is reconstructed because it reflects such a powerful aspect of culture, and also a foundation for tourism. Needless to say, these buildings are greatly important to both the economic and social facet.
In a nutshell, I conceive that the conservation of ancient construction is crucial, and should not be destroyed for urbanization.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73151750973 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51106896297 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607003891051 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2974537662 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.214285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146123179185 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526887872318 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036288790082 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922301613006 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312278803114 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.