The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments' expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, a significant fund that was allocated to restore old buildings in major cities has been provoked debates whether that money should spend for alternative usages such as for new housing and road development. In my opinion, the restoration of old buildings is essential and play an important role in human development.
First, old buildings are a representation of the traditional characteristics of cities. Old buildings are the past that making what cities become today and should be respected and reserved so that our children have somethings to know about their ancient’s life. For instance, London or Paris – one of the biggest cities in the world spend a lot of money in the preservation of old and elegant buildings to respect their historical and cultural values. For that reason, the world can study their history through the architectures with admirable feelings. Also, glorious and elegant constructions which have remained over the decades are the eminent objects to draw tourist’s attention and making huge domestic income.
Second, new housing and road development are necessary for modern citizens, but we still combine that development with restoring old buildings in terms of functional aspect. In particular, authorities can take advantages of reusing old buildings for residential and business activities. For example, an old building can be restored then buying for city dwellers to live or open stores. Obviously, stores with historical and cultural facades will draw more superior attention and will have highly appreciated by customers.
In conclusion, the restoration of the old building not only preserve the beauty of culture but also bring promising profits from tourists. And governments should bring it into serious consideration when discussing developmental policies.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, then, well, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55755395683 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10098022572 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607913669065 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2827286173 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.846153846 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282278675734 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997906666936 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670398339628 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177887981622 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575575576669 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.