Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty.
Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor
countries rather than financial aid.
In modern times, the issue of helping undeveloped countries by developed countries has become highly controversial. There are those who say that big countries should many different types of help to undeveloped countries, however others believe that they should not. In this essay I will examine both sides of argument and provide my overall opinion.
Generally speaking, there are a wide range of reasons why people believe that big countries should provide many types of help to undeveloped countries. Perhaps the main reason why people think that they should do it that undeveloped countries are not able to provide help to their people. If rich countries provide many different types of help to them, they can provide that help to their people. A further point in favour of the idea that big countries should help other undeveloped countries, not just economic, they should help undeveloped countries’ medical services, education oppurtunities etc. As a result of that, they can move into the developing countries category in a short time.
Despite these arguments, there is also a case for the idea that big nations should not provide help to poor countries. The most strongest argument of this idea that even if a country is undeveloped, it is still independent so it can improve their economic strategies or another strategies. Unlike in the past, almost all countries have their independence now. If undeveloped countries want to improve their nation, they can set new policies for growing and being a developed country. In this point of view, they don’t need any help from big countries because in modern world every country has to make best for their people. Big countries should help people who live in their nation and need food, health insurance, place to stay or Money etc. A good illustration of this is that the USA is a developed and strong country but there are thousands of people who are homeless, the USA should help people who live in the USA, first.
In conclusion, it must be said that helping undeveloped countries by developed countries has become a complex issue with no easy answers. I believe quite strongly that developed countries should provide other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid because only financial help does not make sense and poor contries need help in different ways. If they can not reach help about economic, social or health issues, people who live in poor countries can not reach equal level of modernity and there will be no proportion with all people from the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...those who say that big countries should many different types of help to undeveloped countries,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...their people. If rich countries provide many different types of help to them, they can provide...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'strongest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: strongest
...not provide help to poor countries. The most strongest argument of this idea that even if a co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the strongest'.
Suggestion: most the strongest
...not provide help to poor countries. The most strongest argument of this idea that even if a co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, as to, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 7.85571142285 280% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 426.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99295774648 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6246913355 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43661971831 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6303737426 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.166666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377783280448 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158284344506 0.084324248473 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867715042929 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281797346167 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047515463493 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.