The developed countries should bring experienced and skilled workers from the poorer nation and offer them a job. I completely agree with this statement for various benefits of it.
To begin with, underdeveloped countries are having lack of employment opportunities. Provided that America took 3214 Computer engineers from the developing country India, it will not only help America to fulfill their manpower demand but will give remittance to India which will strengthen the economy. Furthermore, the poorer nations will get a chance to developed as like developed countries. For instance, the Immigrant will come to their country after a certain time, they can use those techniques and strategies which the rich countries used to solve their problems and, also can introduce new ways to improve their own country. Therefore, the poor countries will have a chance to make their country rich faster and use their style to get benefits.
However, bringing employees to the rich nations can also bring some disadvantages. Firstly, the immigrant can forget about their country and unwill to return or give remittance to their motherland. Some may stay in developed countries for their lifetime and do not keep any contact with their country. As a result of this, only the person and the developed counties will be benefited instead of the sender country. Moreover, the immigrant can also forget about their culture and bring foreign culture to their country. My country's people, for instance, brought Hinduism and Christian culture to our Muslim country Bangladesh. As a consequence of this, our upcoming generation has a great risk of falling in danger and forgot about their own Islam.
To conclude, Allowing work in wealthy nations from poor has a tremendous good opportunity for both the person and country. However, the risks cannot be unnoticed as it can hemper their own culture and tradition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of this, our upcoming generation has a great risk of falling in danger and forg...
^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s a tremendous good opportunity for both the person and country. However, the ris...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25245901639 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7119332775 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534426229508 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5083822864 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234750870762 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850653451868 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732067132763 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160258723642 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562823625909 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.