School children are becoming far too dependent on computers. This is having an alarming effect on
reading and writing skills. Teachers need to avoid using computers in the classroom at all costs and
go back to teaching basic study skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge
or experience.
Nowadays, the computers have dramatically changed our world and educational methods are not exception. It seems that the school children are deeply depend on the computers as the majority of pamphlets are found in electronic and often the teachers are likely to teach by digital facilities. However some people believe that the students lose their abilities like writing and reading. This issue is going to be more discussed as follows.
Apparently, the teaching techniques are becoming altered as in some developed countries like Korea pupils do not copy the content from blackboard. In other words, the scanners have been installed which scan whatever has been written on the board and finally, print them for students. Besides, all printed papers are justified in discipline lines neatly and there is no need to read the unreadable handwritings. This matter has brought serious problems as sometimes due to bad handwriting prescriptions of doctors some patients have lost their lives.
On the other hand, critics argue that the kids spend hours in front of the computer for chatting and video games. Therefore, it is not the right approach the computers get involved in the academic centers anymore. They assume that even though the conventional ways may not be as effective as the modern techniques, but we always finally go back to basic methods. Moreover, some individuals think the beautiful handwriting is a mirage and cultural achievement that we should transfer to next generations.
To sum it up, in my opinion using the computers in the schools are inevitable and gradually is going to change the teaching methods. By far, the principles of high schools can schedule few hours in a weak for student to do their assignment traditionally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...ems that the school children are deeply depend on the computers as the majority of pam...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... likely to teach by digital facilities. However some people believe that the students l...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble and gradually is going to change the teaching methods. By far, the principles...
^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t to do their assignment traditionally.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19014084507 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82954030781 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637323943662 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6551756791 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218709551478 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616742764745 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413220750487 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118739624415 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339196396089 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.