Computers are replacing notebook, personal organizer, multimedia and other related items, in almost every aspect of life. Learning computer is the only sustainable way to move ahead in a globally connected world. Therefore, their introduction in classroom has become imperative for quality education. Further, the softwares and applications should be used to teach them day to day chores and functions.
One the one hand, using automated programs or computers are beneficial for young minds to learn new tools for facilitating their future occupation, also to simplify daily tasks that can benefit from Automation. Learning new tools earlier can help them advance in technological know-how at younger age, this may further lead them towards exploring new avenues where the tools and automation can add value, this can lead to inventions and patents too. Hence, there are evident benefits. There are multiple examples today where kids have used STEM to detect new celestial element, detect new contaminants in water, trace sources of pandemics and so on. Kid Inventors are making their countries and society at large very proud.
On the other hand, the world has witnessed multiple disadvantages of toddlers and primary kids over usage of technology leading to multiple addictions, deteriorated vision, poor lexical and cognitive development too. There are behavioral changes noticed, such as Stress, lack of sleep leading to anxiety, lack of emotional intelligence development, poor physical fitness and low attention span.
To summarize, technology and computers can aid learning through interactive tools and multimedia. Kids can be taught multiple computer languages in school using which early learners can devise their own programs, making them enablers. However, this should be done in moderation considering holistic development of children where they get to socialize, learn to develop relationships, learn to solve problems through creativity, develop their lexical resources and experience Art, which will make them creators or artists too.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87056293164 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63430420712 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2621911856 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.071428571 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104691106995 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328987085771 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358947440429 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0590525161497 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349878190611 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.