School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes thought that school teachers have the pivotal role to strengthen the base of social and academic development of the students instead of the parents. In my opinion, I agree that to do so the responsibility of the teacher is paramount.
One good reason why teachers are more liable for student’s social and intellectual upbringing is that they always stay in touch with their teachers during their school time and, in fact, it is the prime time for them to learn academics and to take part in different extra-curricular activities. Consequently, teachers get the chances of monitoring their students as well as making a correction in their mistakes. Moreover, as the teachers are well experienced by profession in educational perspective and social manner by handling students of different backgrounds, it appears to be easy for them to diffuse those skills among the students.
Another point to consider for the teachers’ responsibility of students overall improvement is that school is one of the most important places for the students where they get opportunities not only to participate in a variety of social events such as National Day celebration and annual sporting events but also can explore their logical thinking by participating in debate and science and arts competition. Therefore, obviously, on all those occasions, almost all of the students are being driven by the teachers. As a result, there might be created a huge scope for the teachers to direct the students in the proper way which, in turn, lead them to become independent in social and intellectual perspectives.
To conclude, it can be said that in order to upgrade the students social and intellectual aspects teachers seem to be far more responsible than their parents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...viously, on all those occasions, almost all of the students are being driven by the teache...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20905923345 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16336395585 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540069686411 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.4028003215 49.4020404114 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.111111111 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8888888889 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5555555556 7.06120827912 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38328173747 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160844342951 0.084324248473 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728740022295 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252822739659 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504830996704 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.