School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the rise in modernization, a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking barefooted in the jungles to take the first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issues which remains irrevocable and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that trainer should have responsible for intellectual skill growth of children rather than parents or not? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic with example and good illustration and shape up my opinion by the end.
On one side, there is a group of people Who believe that tutor are responsible for social and intellectual development of students. They have been highly crucial role in children life as a god. Firstly, the teachers had trained in the intellectual growth of courses who are psychological learnt behaviour of children. According to my perspective,secondly, children have been gained moral values and how to make good ettiqutes in own his life. Moreover, that is learnt for the helps of trainers. The best epitome of this is the United state of America is compulsory taught lesson of ettiqutes for all school children. It is better way to development of children good habits.
On the other hand, parents are wherever, responsible for good intelluctual skill build up in the children life. First and foremost point is children are genetically depend upon behaviour of parents, especially, parents are understood behaviour and habits of children. They have memorable and loveable person in childhood life however, children do not agree with parents. It is bad impact and update attitude level in children because, it is gap new- generation in between parents. A good illustration this is the psychologist theory is written by gean Piaget say that children behavior genetically on parents behaviour.
To crown it all, I pen down saying that, weighing both the options; I believe that there is no single conclusion still; I take this ground that an effective clap requires both use of hands therefore undoubtedly, teachers is responsible because, tutors have punished the student for bad etiquettes and good growth of intellectual skills other hand, parents do not punshied own her children because every child is memorable and loveable part of parents life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , secondly
...of children. According to my perspective,secondly, children have been gained moral value...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n. According to my perspective,secondly, children have been gained moral values a...
^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...emost point is children are genetically depend upon behaviour of parents, especially, ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and loveable part of parents life.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22641509434 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99219056052 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536388140162 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.4811545183 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.722222222 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17248158316 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547913962663 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595431053503 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104539238166 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247641105959 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.