Scientists and technology experts seem to be more value by modern society than musicians and artists.
According to a recent survey by Time magazine, 60 percent of people reported the contribution of scientists and technology experts are more essential compared to musicians' and artists'. I am convinced that rationalists are definitely more valuable to our society than artists, for technological inventions and scientific developments have noticeably enhanced our lives, and only technologists can ensure the future generation a better lifestyle.
In the first place, I understand that scientific researchers are more beneficial than artists because we live in a world where scientists have significantly improved our lives. In other words, nowadays the comfort brought by smart devices has totally captured our attention and made us completely dependent on these gadgets. Simply put, because of invaluable input of scientists, we can afford various vehicles to quickly overcome long distances, and different devices, such as phones or computers, which simplify all we do. Also, it is advanced medicine developed by science that, in fact, improved our health care and extended human lifespan. So, it is hard to imagine our life without scientific inventions, and clearly, therefore, scientists should really be appreciated.
In the second place, people also understand that they can improve their lifestyle and make sure that the future generation has better living conditions only through the development of science and technology. To explain, thanks to scientists, we are able to achieve longevity or discover new forms of energy. For example, the range of milestones includes hi-tech vehicles with lower environmental damage and medicines against fatal diseases like cancer. All in all, it can be concluded that the range of contributions of scientists has a real potential to credit their fame.
All things considered, obviously, it is clear that technology experts made a significant contribution to development and improvement of life of the current generation. Therefore, it seems to me that scientists and technologists are more esteemed by modern society than musicians and artists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... future generation a better lifestyle. In the first place, I understand that sc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, therefore, as to, for example, in fact, such as, in other words, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63722397476 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11859928737 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602523659306 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0609860629 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.461538462 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278795619422 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979423641951 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13936217336 0.0667982634062 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201856034859 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15239983491 0.056905535591 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.