Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists. To what extent do you agree?
THE MODERN WORLD USUALLY PREFERS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OVER, ARTS AND MUSIC. I COMPLETELY DISAGREE WITH THIS OPINION OF PEOPLE.
IN TODAY'S WORLD, WHERE MODERN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROPAGATES, PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT THE PERSON WHO IS RELATED TO TECHNOLOGY OR SCIENCE, IS MORE INTELLIGENT THAN AN ARTIST. THE MODERN SOCIETY DEVALUES ARTISTS AND MUSICIANS BECAUSE THEY TAKE IT AS AN EASY JOB. IN ADDITION, THEY BELIEVE THAT THEY DO NOT MAKE ANY EFFORTS TO BECOME AN ARTIST OR A MUSICIAN WHILE, BECOMING A SCIENTIST OR A TECHNOLOGY PERSON, ONE NEEDS TO BE INTELLIGENT AS WELL AS HARDWORKING. FOR INSTANCE, THE HIGH MERIT CANDIDATES ALWAYS CHOOSE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, WHEREAS, LOW MERITS CAN GO TO ARTS COLLEGE AS WELL.
DESPITE OF THE COMMON BELIEF THAT THE ARTIST AND MUSICIANS ARE DEVALUED,
SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT, THEY ARE ACTUALLY VALUED MORE THAN TECHNICAL PEOPLE. FOR EXAMPLE, WITH THE ADVANCED MARKETING AND IN THE WORLD OF MORE ARTS COUNCILS, PEOPLE PREFER TO GO TO ART GALLERIES AND ATTEND LIVE MUSIC CONCERTS. THEREFORE, ARTISTS AND MUSICIANS HAVE MORE FAME THAN SCIENTISTS AND TECHNOLOGY EXPERTS.
TO CONCLUDE, IT IS BELIEVED THAT FUN OF ARTS AND MUSIC HAS LESSER VALUE THAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. IN MY OPINION, WITH INCREASED AWARENESS OF ART AMONG NEW GENERATION NOW THE CONCEPT OF ARTS HAS BEEN CHANGED AND HAS GOT MORE RECOGNITION THAN USUAL FIELDS AS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN RECENT DAYS. SO, I COMPLETELY DISAGREE WITH OLD THINKING OF UNDER RATING ARTISTIC PROFESSIONS.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'art'.
Suggestion: Art
...CHNOLOGY, WHEREAS, LOW MERITS CAN GO TO ARTS COLLEGE AS WELL. DESPITE OF THE CO...
^^^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... MERITS CAN GO TO ARTS COLLEGE AS WELL. DESPITE OF THE COMMON BELIEF THAT THE AR...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15573770492 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69154668213 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577868852459 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7047487736 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.833333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222640388259 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892838737543 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712369369223 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116443525938 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577784791769 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.