Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Do you think it is a positive or negative development ? Why ?
It is true that evolution of breakthrough in technology and science lead to scientist suggest that computers would be instead human to driving cars in the period of prosperity for some years later. I strongly believe that it is a wholly positive.
Scientists have a good reasons to believe that computer-driven cars appear soon become norm in few years later. Firstly, urbanisation and industrialisation period over the world have been built rapidly in achievement of infrastructures which being to establish system of brainy cities. Thus, it is a obvious advantages to access advance in science such as future cars or smart devices for life day to day. Furthermore, navigation systems would be able to apply in some tools to guide people to the destination as a accurately measurement. Secondly, speed up of modern cars near future is useful to tackle complex issues in urgent requirements. For instance, this can be to cut down waste time of some emergent circumstance in high-speed communication period nowadays.
For the perspective of social, driven-vehicles by computer show a decline in death of the road or some injuries. Firstly, primary consequences from a vigorous increase of accident is irresponsibility and bad awareness behaviours. As a result, the most elderly people or disabilities people avoid almost unfortunate consequences for their family. Finally, the government of developing countries should investing technology for car systems. This trend boost both potential of commercial and go down emission of CO2 into the atmosphere.
In conclusion, computer-driven cars brings array of positive impact for both environment and demand of social now. It is effective steps to grow modern cities in near future of humanity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave been built rapidly in achievement of infrastructures which being to establish...
^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...sh system of brainy cities. Thus, it is a obvious advantages to access advance in...
^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'advantage'?
Suggestion: advantage
...of brainy cities. Thus, it is a obvious advantages to access advance in science such as fu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s to guide people to the destination as a accurately measurement. Secondly, speed...
^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('accurately') instead an adjective, or a noun ('measurement') instead of another adjective.
...s to guide people to the destination as a accurately measurement. Secondly, speed up of modern cars near...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...waste time of some emergent circumstance in high-speed communication period nowad...
^^
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'boosts'.
Suggestion: boosts
... technology for car systems. This trend boost both potential of commercial and go dow...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43223443223 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31240866257 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8386758263 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16984419166 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525882188749 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419999846049 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104737821904 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429964669654 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.