Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
ere is a growing tendency that globalization has increasingly gained popularity throughout the world. This is the primary reason as to why scientists predict that human beings are likely to use a global language. However, I contend that the benefits of speaking a language is undeniable, this lead to several adverse consequences for the society.
One the one hand, it is commonly believed that global individuals obtain considerable advantages when creating a connection by using a language. The first prominent issue that the same language may facilitate communication and insight into culture among the countries. There is a clear evidence for this is that authorities in a variety of countries might comprehend and respond positively in global conferences. As a result, they can avoid misunderstanding others by language disparity. The second thing that is worthing mention that the tourism industry will be more beneficial from using the same language. The visitors have no hesitation in traveling and discovering history or culture in the rest of the world. Therefore, any country can not only gain more profitable for tourism but also spreads indigenous hestiges and culture for the world community.
On the other hand, it is argued that language homogeneity is more likely to affect adversely on the society. Initially, the prevalence of the same language has pushed some minority languages on the verge of extinction. In fact, it is urgent that speaking mother language gain less importance in some countries due to the popularity of English or China. Every now and then, the world will lose culture identities that are established over millions of years. Furthermore, loss of mother language can be potential to eliminate the distinctive culture of any nation. For instance, people those using American language are inclined to wearing western styles or eating exotic food instead of treasuring their cultural value. In this scenario, the global community will be autonomous by this resemblance.
In conclusion, it seems to me that there is no denying that speaking a language can be advantageous for some reasons, however, drawbacks of this phenomenon should be considered carefully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ere
ere is a growing tendency that globalizatio...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... adverse consequences for the society. One the one hand, it is commonly believe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and culture for the world community. On the other hand, it is argued that lan...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: Now and then
... to the popularity of English or China. Every now and then, the world will lose culture identities...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill be autonomous by this resemblance. In conclusion, it seems to me that there...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, may, second, so, then, therefore, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35838150289 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02738456465 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552023121387 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8587985906 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132410516812 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446051635308 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499675306285 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893150342027 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322386314033 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.