Animals experiments have never failed to be a heated debate among the society, research institutes, and universities. Some people hold the position that it would be interesting when using living animals for researches. However, some others take the view that animals experiments must be cruel. Personally, I would not be hesitate to side with the former view with several reasons.
The first important reason is that it would be easier to have direct consequences when using animals to do researches. When testing the medical effects of a new type of medicine, scientists vaccinate this kind of medicine to animals such as mouse, dogs, etc. Hence, using animals could be a ready mean of measuring the experiment results in the field of medical researches.
What's more, with the development of gene technology and transplantation, we can use animals' organs or gene to cure human-being ourselves. As we all know, artificial organs and gene still have some drawbacks, like conflicition with other organs, when applying in medical care. Therefore, animals could make the contributions of organs and gene to patients.
Although it is suggested that using animals to do research would be contradicted to humanitarian thinkings, it is true that using animals in moderation would be helpful for progress of medical science researches. We appreciate the contributions of these animals' life to research, but we have to do that. This is because not only is progress of medical researches beneficial for humans, but it would be great possible to crue some serious disease in animals.
In my opinion, I supposed that there is no evidence that showing the links between using animals for researches and cruelty if we can using animals in a reasonable way. It would be prospective useful for all creatures in our planet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... in the field of medical researches. Whats more, with the development of gene tech...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...e appreciate the contributions of these animals life to research, but we have to do tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...ls for researches and cruelty if we can using animals in a reasonable way. It would b...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 149, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reasonable way" with adverb for "reasonable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hes and cruelty if we can using animals in a reasonable way. It would be prospective useful for all...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, i suppose, kind of, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18367346939 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96067676774 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5881962378 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215481817772 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086190761684 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582216767863 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13113523017 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363005409143 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.