settlement of the Chaco Canyon

Essay topics:

settlement of the Chaco Canyon

The lecture showed the three theories that explain the about the settlement of the Chaco Canyon in New Mexico. However, the passage contradicts the theory presented in the lecture.

Firstly, the lecture said that even though the settlements look like the apartment building from the outside they are not meant for the residential area of the family. Because, although the inside of the building has many rooms, it does not contain the many fire rooms as required, for say 100 families. Each family cook food every day so these buildings are not to be meant for the residential area. This opposes the ideas in the passage which says that the buildings are purely for residential areas of 100 people each.

Secondly, the lecture showed that the buildings are not used for storing food supplies, maize. As there are no traces of the maize present anywhere, also there are no containers of maize. On the other hand, the passage stated that buildings are for storing food supplies as the size of the house is suitable for storing maize.

Thirdly, according to the lecture, the buildings are not meant for the ceremonial centers. Because these structure has the building material and construction material. Again the broken pots are of the workers who eat a meal there. However, the passage said that the structures are used for ceremonial centers as there are discarded pots of the festive meal.

Thus, we can conclude that although the passage says that the structures in Chaco are used either for any of the reasons residential, storing food supplies or for the ceremonial center. The lecture shows how it has opposes the reasons.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99272727273 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4683758504 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498181818182 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0269571469 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0934040768587 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362182047394 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100086724963 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077249671954 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11092621667 0.056905535591 195% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.