Sea otters.
Both the reading and the lecture discuss the decline in the population of the sea otter. The reading states that the most likely cause of the decline is the environmental pollution. However, the lecturer refutes this belief presented in the passage by stating that the most likely cause of the decline is the attacks by the predators.
To begin with, the reading claim that there is a lot of pollution on the Alaskan coast. This is because there is oil rigs and the other sources of industrial chemical, which decreases the otters resistance to the infection, as a result they died. Nevertheless, the lecturer contrasts this idea by pointing out that the pollution theory is weakened by the fact that no one has found the dead sea of washing on the beach.
Secondly, the reading mentions that the other species are declined because of the pollution. As the population of the other sea mammals such as seals and sea lions is also declined. And the orcas has the same effect but the orcas prefer to eat larger prey such as whales. Yet, the lecturer challenges this argument by revealing that the whales obviously prey large animals but they have changed their diet and now eating to the small mammals. She states that the whales are disappeared due to the human hunter and hence only the sea mammals are there in the ocean and hence the orcas are eating small mammal such as seal, sea lion, and sea otter.
Lastly, the reading argues that the population of the sea otter is a decline in some areas and in some areas it is stable. Since the ocean current and the other environmental factors have created this uneven pattern. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this theory by explaining that the place where the sea otter live is accessible to the orcas and hence sea otters have declined. She asserts that the shallow and rocky locations are accessible to the orcas and hence the population of the sea otter is decline because the orcas make sea otters as their prey.
Thus, there is a stark difference between the passage and the lecturer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...ndustrial chemical, which decreases the otters resistance to the infection, as a resul...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 360.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73055555556 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37482780402 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.416666666667 0.540411800872 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 530.1 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1054758167 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.4375 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20466942073 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748665494243 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925752214347 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101252334877 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778226498193 0.0443174109184 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.