should ban dangerous sport or not?
In today's competitive world, an increasing number of people are concerned about dangerous sports such as bungee or boxing. Therefore, whether the authorities should prevent citizens from playing these sports is a highly debated issue. This essay will discuss both points of view before coming to a reasonable conclusion.
It is irrefutable that these kinds of activity could certainly cause injuries to the athletes. In this regard, a person who participated in these hazardous sports would frequently suffer from both mental and physical pain due to an enormous amount of massive body contacts. As a consequence, if those who involved in sports like martial art might not able to control themselvees, they could bring about permanent trauma, even death to the opponents. Furthermore, it could be harmful to the spectators, especially children because they could immitate what the saw and form a detrimental habit.
Having said that, despite its negative effect, people still legalized it due to the positive sides. Many people in the world are enjoying these sports, not to mention that they might be their careers so that millions people will lose their job if the government forbid them. More to the point, most of television shows have been consored and warned for the observers. To illustrate, one of the most well-known competition in the world, WWE is siutable for adults and children as well. It of course has been strictly controlled by the governmentd and the participants are protected with safety equipments.
In conclusion, my view is that the authorities should not prohibit these activities but censor and supervise thm. By doing so, we can make ssure that the players are insured.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mentd and the participants are protected with safety equipments. In conclusion, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77846262265 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643636363636 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5014788207 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127514277384 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378660680013 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586607808354 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826163054912 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774004551746 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.