Smacking children is the best form of discipline. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Discipline is a must in children, and can be achieved in many ways, either through punishment or making kids understand politely. Some parents believe that physical punishment is the most effective way in order to raise their child as a well-mannered being. This essay will argue that spanking children will have adverse effects on the mindset of kids, hence I completely disagree with the above-mentioned belief.
Parents always want their children to be well-behaved in society. To begin with, people believe that serving physical punishment after making mistake will make children remember the pain. Hence, the child will avoid doing the same unacceptable activity again. For instance, the research from the children protection association shows that 70% of parents slap their children when at fault. Thus, many parents strongly believe hitting the child will make him avoid repeating the same incorrect activity again.
Slapping or punishing the child physically also has a bad influence on the child’s mentality. In a long run, these children become more stubborn and start developing a feeling of disrespect for their parents. For example, many children start reacting aggressively, always carrying harsh feelings for their parents. Instead, it is always better to talk to a child and explain their mistake. Eventually, the child will understand the scenario and work on improving his/her mistake. To sum up, I strongly disagree with the notion of hitting the child for their mistake and support them by speaking to them.
In conclusion, we argued that spanking is not the solution for misbehaving children. In my opinion, children should be counseled and should be given a second chance to improve their mistakes instead of punishing them physically.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, second, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37184115523 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76675647956 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570397111913 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7929708206 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0999032006715 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369918757814 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285826983286 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672209658494 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183217746699 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.