Environmental damages around the world have always been on increasing due to numerous reasons and some people say that it could be addressed by raising the cost of petroleum products such as petrol and diesel. Whereas, I believe that increasing the price of fuel alone cannot help in providing a solution to environmental damages, as there are several other key issues to be addressed.
It is true that burning of fossil fuels adversely impacts our environment. Carbon-di-oxide and other greenhouse gases emitted by vehicles and factories are the primary reason for global warming. Besides depleting the ozone layer, they also cause climate changes to occur. Nevertheless, in my view, increasing the cost of fuels alone will not be a sufficient measure to tackle this ever-increasing undesirable trend.
In order to reduce the usage of fuel, instead of increasing the cost of petroleum products several other efficient measures could be implemented by the government. Firstly, the state must take measures to reduce the number of vehicles owned by an individual and heavy tax shall be imposed on those who have cars or bikes beyond the limits specified by the lawmakers. Secondly, people shall be encouraged to use public transports. Accordingly, the government should take steps to create and maintain an effiecient publice transport system by building bridges, streamiling the traffic, etc which will enable people to opt for public transportaion. Thirdly, every individual must take an effort to use bicycles or electric vehicles, which are not depended upon fuel for their operations. Finally, apart from the above measures other primary reasons for environmental damages such as deforestation and over usage of plastics should be strictly eradicated from the system.
To recapitulate, although it is an undeniable fact that over-consumption of fossil fuels produces undesirable results to an environment, raising the cost of fuels alone will not help us in the battle against such severe environmental damage. To fight against this negative trend, there are several other efficient measures as mentioned above in the essay shall be implemented.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, finally, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, whereas, apart from, such as, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4255952381 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03546771874 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0087388998 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.214285714 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163539701422 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597891476926 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608196650774 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118343204309 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483057508672 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.