In the era of technology, the development done in different fields impacted both the wealthy and poor people. Some people believe that this advancement drastically increase the gap between the poorer and rich group although in my opinion it makes the real life things simpler as well as the accessibility of things all around the world is easier.
The advancement in the automation industry change the view of the current generation which leads to a long road between the wealthy and poor people. The main reason behind this view is the cost of the new technology in the market which is only affordable by the well settled people. In addition to this, the services offered are only deployed in the high-end places and cities so the accessibility to the poor is very less. For Instance, In Dubai, the implementation of the automated robots for customer services is only implemented in the city walk area which has more European and Arabic people.
In contrast to this, the implementation of the technology in the real life services like the transportation, front-desk services make it accessible to all. There is no difference as per the status of the person in accessing those services. For example, In Dubai the automated bus are available which has AI implementation all across the city. The second main boom in the industry is of the internet revolution which reduce all the gaps across the world. Everyone is accessing the internet in their own ways and this really make the life of people simpler as everything is available on the touch of finger.
To conclude, the progressive development in the technology make this world so small as everyone can access everything at any time. In my view the positive development bridge the gap of poor and rich people across the globe and works in the betterment of the population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...n it makes the real life things simpler as well as the accessibility of things all...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, really, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91290322581 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8432679678 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477419354839 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5964721681 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.153846154 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174607331082 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609651338617 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619558792719 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120251260606 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658291143004 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.