Some children can learn more efficiently by watching TV. Therefore, children should watch TV regularly both in school and at home? Do you agree or disagree?
Many scientists believe that television is a core medium for more effective learning of children as TV provides a perfectly synchronized medium of sound and visuals to stimulate knowledge. This essay disagrees that young boys and girls should watch TV on daily basis in schools and households. Since TVBox can be a major hindrance to limiting their social activities along with watching inappropriate programs can be addictive and create adverse behaviour among children.
To commence with, various broadcasts nowadays provide excellent educational value. Although these telecasts prove to be an appropriate medium of learning, it seems to be a principal cause to avoid outdoor activities. Moreover, many children prefer to enjoy particular programs than go out for sports or read a book. These will not only restrict their social characteristics but also reduce their communication skills with society. A recent questionnaire by "Southeast University" says about 90% of young kids' Key human characteristics such as friendship, teamwork, leadership, etc come from outdoor sports.
On the other hand, Television broadcasts a wide range and types of programs. In addition, many of them exhibit violence and inappropriate language which can promote improper attitudes towards family and society which can curb the development of youths. Furthermore, many broadcasts only have entertainment purposes therefore, school students become addicted to them. To cite an example, an article in "The New-york daily" described that overwatching television is the pivotal reason for about 60% of school students' poor grades.
In a nutshell, a TVbox is a spectacular source of learning for youth but within a certain measure. Otherwise, It may lead to faulty behaviour as well as can act as a drawback to acquiring human skills. Hence, it is needless to say that the extension of the regularity of Television in schools and houses should be discouraged.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55666666667 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20879866755 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643333333333 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9607984929 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.133333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181291048737 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530258951563 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650969423456 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111251437587 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106117418058 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.