Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
In this modern era, technology has become a part and parcel of one’s life. Smartphones are one among these gadgets that are widely used by all age groups of people especially children. Doubtlessly, it has made human life easier, but at the same time has given rise to adversities. This essay will discuss both the perspectives.
To commence with positives, with the access of internet to a smartphone, kids can surf information about everything. This will help them better understand about the concepts taught in school and aid them in increasing their knowledge base. Furthermore, not only studies but students can also gain extra skills like music and dance. It serves many upsides, one of the best example would be during the pandemic, where children couldn’t go to school and attend their classes as a result of which online classes came into existence. Most of the students attended their class via such modern gadgets. It indeed was a saviour. Additionally, it is also a good source of entertainment.
Despite the advantages, there is a downside to it. Long exposure of screen that emits blue lights can hurt eyes, further more can elevate to a headache due to its extensive use and result in a health hazard. Likewise, there is an ill-effect on mind as well, pupils get addicted to these devices very easily which can make them become introverts in a long run because they would lack the necessary social skills. Additionally, kids get exposed to a wide range of things which are beyond their age. This can lead to detrimental effects.
In conclusion, the usage of smartphones will act as a boon as long as its usage is monitored, otherwise can be quite harmful.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, likewise, so, well, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90526315789 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73743583303 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642105263158 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7945859851 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2352941176 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108279108868 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352402554166 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039414757338 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062999079216 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332671905366 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.