Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?
It is true that high-rises have been constructed in a multitude of municipal areas for the city dwellers. Meanwhile, other cities choose to build residential housing horizontally. From my perspective, vertical buildings are far better in today’s social context.
First of all, the growing population in megacities is the main reason why building upwards is more preferable. The truth is that cities are often seen as places of opportunities for education, employment, entertainment, which all contribute to a decent standard of living. Accordingly, the number of people flocking to metropolises is on the rise, putting a strain on accommodation provision. Housing shortage therefore becomes the key issue facing urban residents. With less and less land available, the property prices are skyrocketing, making homeownership virtually out of reach for low- and middle-income households. For this reason, creating taller buildings might somehow ease the problem as skyscrapers could accommodate more populations compared to the conventional places of residence.
What is more, vertical living is more favorable than horizontal living in terms of convenience and comfort. There is no denying that contemporary housing complexes include not only living space for tenants or homebuyers but also a variety of facilities such as entertainment venues, gymnasiums, swimming pool and so on. This means that urban citizens can reduce their commutes, resulting in the improvement of environmental quality as less exhaust fumes are discharged into the air. Another contributing factor to the comfort of high-rise living is that the occupants would not be exposed to external disturbances such as vehicle noise in comparison with low-rise living. These are the major drivers for which vertical dwellings are gaining in popularity in multiple metropolitan areas.
In sum, due to significant population growth and housing crisis, building homes vertically proves to be a more desirable solution. Vertical houses would therefore bring citizens more fulfilling life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-19 | Marywonderlaw | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | qhuy0168 | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-29 | baotram1812 | 73 | view |
- A person spends most of his or her time at the workplace and life becomes meaningless when there is no job satisfaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- There are severe social consequences of housing shortages in cities and only the government can solve these problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them Education and job training are better ways to help them Do you agree or disagree 86
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population country should make use of edible insects as foods However some people believe that insects are not only unhealt 84
- Some companies sponsor sport and sports stars as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, as for, such as, first of all, it is true, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71568627451 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18159871431 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656862745098 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4491883756 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.3125 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225816646314 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698925576701 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740484411949 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148766629768 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827415106294 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.